temp Which of the following is not needed to prove strict ability in a product lability case! Select one: O a. The manufacturer intended to cause the harm Ob The defendant is normally be engaged in the business of selling or distributing that product O c The product is unreasonably dangerous because of its defective status O d. The defect caused the injury A manufacturer is able for inadequate warmings Select one O a. if the warning notified consumers of foreseeable risks O but the warning notified consumers of foreseeable misuses. O cif the warning notified consumers of obvious risks Od. Both A and O Both A and B Which of the following is not a defense to product by ces? Select one O Knowledgeable user Ob Commonly known dangers Assumption of risk Od Statute of Limitations They are all defenses to product by cases An unreasonably dangerous product Select one O is dangerous beyond the reasonable expectations of the comme O bis dangerous because the manufacturer could have them a les dangerous Both And to establish negligence in a product case, sest the product was the Select one Ocause in fact of her O Both A and In which of the following circumstances may a manufacturer be liable for negligence? Select one: O a. Designing the product. O b. Testing the product. O c. Assembling the product. O d. Inspecting the product. e. Manufacturing the product. O f. They are all potential reasons for a negligence claim. Which of the following is not a defense to product liability cases? Select one: O a. Knowledgeable user ob. Commonly known dangers . Assumption of risk O d. Statute of Limitations O e. They are all defenses to product liability cases A defective product Select one: a. dangerous O b. is unreasonably dangerous O c. has the potential to be dangerous O d. is likely to be dangerous