Ten years ago Tom established a business on his own making bird feeders and possum boxes out of old wooden fence palings and then selling them online. His business became very successful, so he decided to convert his business structure to a company with himself as the sole director and sole member. This worked very well for Tom and his company became so successful that his products began to be stocked in major retailers across Australia and several magazines ran stories recommending Tom's products. Two years ago Tom concluded that his business and company were too much to run on his own so he decided that he wanted to appoint another three directors. His plan was that if they also agreed to provide funds to the company, he would also allow them to become shareholders as well. After much thought, Torn decided to appoint three of his family members, Mary, Lottie and Fred as directors and shareholders. Mary and Lottie were his sisters and Fred was Lottie's husband. At the same time, the company adopted a constitution to govern the internal running of the company. Under that constitution, Tom was stated to be the company's managing director, Mary was an executive director. and Lottie and Fred were the non-executive directors with part-time positions maintaining the company's website and sales. Fred also had a separate written agreement with Tom to appoint him to his three positions. Unfortunately the four of them began to have disagreements to the extent that the management of the company began to be very oppressive and dysfunctional. Tom realized that things could not continue as they were because there were so many disagreements which made operating the company very difficult. Please answer the following question: (b) The company adopted a constitution once Mary, Lottie and Fred joined the company. Should Tom's company have adopted a constitution upon registration when he was the sole director and member of the company? Why or why not? Explain