"The advantages that are there with federal, state, tribal, and local trial courts all having jurisdiction over categories of offenses, such as drug offenses include it enhances more supervision of court processes including sentencing and offender rights since some courts have a supervisory jurisdiction, it may also eliminate and spread the risk corruption that is common in drugs court with drug dealers bribing court officials, it may also result to tough and severe punishment for offenders in drug-related cases since different courts have different sentencing mechanisms that suit their jurisdictions. This is advantageous because it may also help states to focus on setting up efficient rehabilitation programs for drug-related offenders that suit their specific rehabilitation needs. The concept of disparities in law also makes it almost impossible to establish a single court to try drug-related cases."

Do you think that there are so many courts so that the legal aspect of each type of court is covered by experts in that area? Think of it like a hospital with doctors that specialize in certain medical areas?

Please review this article and tell me your thoughts?

https://www.findlaw.com/litigation/legal-system/why-isn-t-there-just-one-court-system.html