The Basics of Capital Budgeting: NPV Profile

NPV Profile A project's NPV profile graph intersects the Y-axis at 0% cost of capital and intersects the X-axis at the project's -Select-paybackMIRRIRRCorrect 1 of Item 1 (where NPV = 0). The Y-axis intersection point represents the project's undiscounted NPV. The point at which 2 projects' profiles cross one another is the crossover rate. The crossover rate can be found by calculating the -Select-IRRpaybackMIRRCorrect 2 of Item 1 of the differences in the projects' cash flows (Project Delta). A -Select-flatsteepCorrect 3 of Item 1 NPV profile indicates that increases in the cost of capital lead to large declines in NPV. If a project has most of its cash flows coming in later years, its NPV will -Select-declineriseCorrect 4 of Item 1 sharply if the cost of capital increases; but a project whose cash flows come earlier will not be severely penalized by high capital costs. The significance of the crossover rate is that at any cost of capital -Select-lessgreaterCorrect 5 of Item 1 than the crossover rate, the NPV and IRR methods will provide the same conclusion for evaluating mutually exclusive projects. However, at any cost of capital -Select-lessgreaterCorrect 6 of Item 1 than the crossover rate, the NPV and IRR methods' conclusions will conflict. In that situation, the -Select-IRRNPVMIRRpaybackCorrect 7 of Item 1 method will always provide the correct project acceptance result. Quantitative Problem: Bellinger Industries is considering two projects for inclusion in its capital budget, and you have been asked to do the analysis. Both projects' after-tax cash flows are shown on the time line below. Depreciation, salvage values, net operating working capital requirements, and tax effects are all included in these cash flows. Both projects have 4-year lives, and they have risk characteristics similar to the firm's average project. Bellinger's WACC is 9%.

	0		1		2		3		4
Project A	-1,050		600		350		230		270
Project B	-1,050		270		330		390		780

What is Project Delta's IRR? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places. %

What is the significance of this IRR?

It is the -Select-equity returncrossover rateinterest yieldCorrect 1 of Item 2, after this point when mutually exclusive projects are considered there is no conflict in project acceptance between the NPV and IRR approaches.

Review the graphs below. Select the graph that correctly represents the correct NPV profile for Projects A and B by using the following drop down menu.

-Select-ABCD

4. 4: The Basics of Capital Budgeting: NPV Profile The Basics of Capital Budgeting: NPV Profile NPV Profile A project's NPV profile graph intersects the Y-axis at 0% cost of capital and intersects the X-axis at the project's -Select- (where NPV = 0). The Y-axis intersection point represents the project's undiscounted NPV. The point at which 2 projects' profiles cross one another is the crossover rate. The crossover rate can be found by calculating the -Select- of the differences in the projects' cash flows (Project Delta). A -Select- NPV profile indicates that increases in the cost of capital lead to large declines in NPV. If a project has most of its cash flows coming in later years, its NPV will -Select- sharply if the cost of capital increases; but a project whose cash flows come earlier will not be severely penalized by high capital costs. The significance of the crossover rate is that at any cost of capital -Select- than the crossover rate, the NPV and IRR methods will provide the same conclusion for evaluating mutually exclusive projects. However, at any cost of capital -Select- than the crossover rate, the NPV and IRR methods' conclusions will conflict. In that situation, the -Select- method will always provide the correct project acceptance result. Quantitative Problem: Bellinger Industries is considering two projects for inclusion in its capital budget, and you have been asked to do the analysis. Both projects' after-tax cash flows are shown on the time line below. Depreciation, salvage values, net operating working capital requirements, and tax effects are all included in these cash flows. Both projects have 4-year lives, and they have risk characteristics similar to the firm's average project. Bellinger's WACC is 9%. 2 3 Project A Project B -1,050 -1,050 600 270 350 330 230 390 270 780 What is Project Delta's IRR? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places. What is the significance of this IRR? It is the Select after this point when mutually exclusive projects are considered there is no conflict in project acceptance between the NPV and IRR approaches. Review the graphs below. Select the graph that correctly represents the correct NPV profile for Projects A and B by using the following drop down menu. -Select- -Select- NPV Profiles A NPV Profiles B NPV Profiles C TNPV (5) 6001 600+ 5004 TNPV (5) 600+ 5001 4004 5001 3001 2001 1001 1001 5 10 15 20 510 26 30 25 30 Cost of Captal% Cost of Capital %) Cost of Capital %) -2007 -3001 -4001 -1007 -2007 -3001 -4001 -1001 -2007 -3001 -4001 NPV Profiles D TNPV (5) 600+ 500 400 3001 2001 *-* 70 2 5 Coro Capital (%) -1001 -2001 -3001 -4001