The book is : In our Defense (URL): (https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/hi60zw3cx56x88fciwdq5/In-Our-Defense.-all-chapters.pdf?rlkey=lnyc83u1ndfezfb00zljdf4yq&dl=0)

Freedom of Assembly: Hobson v. Wilson" (69)

commentary/analysis on whatever you believe warrants it. What was Cointelpro and how did its purpose conflict with the first amendment rights of the people involved in this case? What did Cointelpro do to carry out its mission that conflicted with the first amendment rights of the people involved in this case? What other constitutional rights (besides the right to assemble) did the FBI violate through Cointelpro? Why were individual FBI agents liable for first amendment violations and not the agency itself? Should the agents be liable for carrying out missions assigned by others? At one point, Brennen says that we will not see the FBI act as they did in the cointelpro operations. Do you think this is true? (What has happened in the recent past that might have opened the door to such activities again?)