The candidate is able to reflect on her reserch affaliate amazon and ebay but this is mostly analytical the form contains many details explanations instead of reflection about the process which leads to the $4$ awards for an example she simply presents i a chronological way what she has done day after day another problem with the form is that it clearly shows the candidates personal perspective about the topic she certainly has the right to choose an opi option but the imbalance is obvious in the form and demonstration a lack of critical distance.