The case is Genuinely Loving Childcare, LLC v. Bre Mariner Conway Crossings, LLC, 209 So.3d 622 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)

This case study will look at the ethical and legal dilemmas associated with the defense of commercial impracticability, also known as frustration of purpose. You will need to find and discuss two Florida Court opinions regarding the defense of commercial impracticability. For each case, you must provide the following: 1) a brief recitation of the facts of the case, indicating the identities of the parties, their relationship; 2) a brief recitation of the issue(s) considered by the court as it analyzes the respective rights and responsibilities of the parties; 3) a summary of the court's decision on the issue and the reason why the court came to this decision; and 4) a discussion of the ethical issues involved. The court might not itself consider the ethics of the contract or the relationship between the parties. However, I ask that you consider the ethics of the following: a) was there a breach of contract? b) what was the reason why the party or parties sought to avoid the contract? c) was this reason known or anticipated by the parties to the contract? d) ethical for the party or parties to withhold performance? e) and why or why not?

Reference:

https://casetext.com/case/genuinely-loving-childcare-llc-v-bre-mariner-conway-crossings-llc-1