The case study that I choose was Study # 2. This study included a sporting event held at the Honda center. The incentive of the study was to offer free parking to the attendees who drove a Honda to the game. And the last part of the study was a survey conducted to ask attendees of the game "what make of car do you own?". TO address this week's questions. What are bias or unethical behavior if any are in the study? The Bias that I identified was that the sporting event location "Honda Center", was the same business brand that was given free parking to those cars at the event. This is a bias to me because only these cars were offered parking. The center did not provide free parking for all cars. The ethical statistician that I believe exist is, because Honda brand cars were asked to be driven on this night that the survey was conducted to obtain free parking. I believe influence the response given by those who were surveyed that drove Honda's. This can impact the reliability because it seems that an incentive was offered to draw out a bias conclusion. To correct the bias or eliminate unethical behavior. In my opinion the study could correct the parameters of the free parking. Free parking to all cars could have been offered to correct the ethical statistician. Or free parking could have been offered to the first 1,00 drivers or the first 500 drivers only. And then asked what car make do they drive? According to the purpose of guidelines the surveyors could have made stated who financially sponsored the survey and why it was being conducted. The survey could have offered a comparison of other car makes and asked which car make is the preferred over all choice. Without full disclosure of free parking made available other than Honda's. And who was responsible for conducting the survey and why? it was being conducted. Or offered other car makes to be surveyed to make a true comparison. Without these changes being made, true data to determine Honda as the number one car is untrue " a reject of the hypothesis should be concluded because no other data was used to compare and determine these findings.

Assignment: Include suggestions for further resources, questions of clarification, or providing context and insight. Avoid simple posts of agreement; if you agree, explain why, and then thoughtfully further the conversation.

Statistical Studies & Ethics Study #1 A study is commissioned to determine whemer or not getting the u shot actually reduces the chances of a person between the ages of 60 and 75 of getting the u. The study is funded by a pharmaceutical company. One thousand participants between the ages of 60 and 1'5 agree to participate in the study. The participants are randomly divided into two groups: 500 of the participants receive the u shot and 500 of the participants receive a placebo treatment (a faux flu shot, per se}. Participants do not know whether or not they are actually receiving the u shot. The participants are monitored for flu-like symptoms during the flu season (from October to April). At the end of the study, researchers cc mpare the number of 60 - TS-year-olds that got the flu shot and ended up coming down with the u to the number of Bi] - 75-year-olds that did not get the u shot and got the flu. Study #2 The Anaheim Ducks have a home game at the Honda Center. and on this particular night. fans that drive a Honda to the game park for free. Additionaliy. fans are approached as they enter the stadium asking them to respond to a quick survey - "What make of car do you own?\" An overwhelming majority of respondents indicated that they drive a Honda. A few months later, an advertisement airs on local television networks that based on a recent study. southern California residents' number one choice of car is the Honda. Study #3: A group of educational researchers is interested to know how screen time affects students' attention spans. The researchers are given parental permission to monitor all fourth-graders at two elementary schools. each consisting of four fourth-grade classes. in Los Angeles County for one week after the Christmas hciiday. In two of the fourth-grade classes at each school. teachers teach lessons during the rst two hours of the school day that require students to use iPads. In the other two fourth-grade classes at each school, teachers teach the same content, but without the use of technology. For the third hour of the school day, ali of the students are given the same activity to complete, which does not require technology. Researchers monitor the students during this activity, assessing the students' attention spans by monitoring how iong each student is able to stay on task. After the week-long study. the re searchers conclude that in fact. screen time affects students' attention spans