The case used in the calculations from the blood splatter lab goes to court. You are called to give evidence on you findings from the blood spatter.

• What can you conclude from your finding and are the accuseds statements consistent with your findings?
  • Make certain you detail what it was from your analysis that brought you to your conclusions.
  • Is there another way to interpret your findings?
  • Would a mathematical error have changed what you "see"?
  • How could someone use the same data to prove a different case?