The case Yahoo v$.$ La Lique Contre Le Racism et l'Antisemitisme, decided in the early $2000\text{'}$s$,$ is a good example of which principle below?

Question $10$ options:

a$)$

laws are similar enough between the US and European countries that it was easy for the French court to enforce a judgment against Yahoo, a California company.

b$)$

companies doing business on the internet must understand their obligations in each country in which their website is viewed.

c$)$

Yahoo was not protected by the First Amendment to the US Constitution and had to change its content to remove all Nazi artifacts, which are illegal to sell in France.