Question
The country of Adventureland has two citizens, Bill and Ted. Bill has a private legal business. He earns $50 per hour. At a tax rate
- The country of Adventureland has two citizens, Bill and Ted. Bill has a private legal business. He earns $50 per hour. At a tax rate of 0%, Bill works 20 hours per week. At a 25% tax rate he works only 16 hours per week, and at a 40% tax rate he works only 8 hours per week. Ted works a manufacturing job. He works 20 hours per week and earns $6 per hour, regardless of the tax rate. The government is considering imposing an income tax of either 25% or 40% on Bill and using the revenues to make transfer payments to Ted. The accompanying table summarizes the three possible policies.
a. Compare the three policies. Are any of the policies obviously less than optimal?
Now suppose that Bill and Ted have the same utility function U(Y) = Y1/2, where Y is consumption (which is equal to net income).
b. Rank the three tax policies discussed in part (a) for a Rawlsian social welfare function. Rank the three for a utilitarian social welfare function.
c. How would your answer change if the utility function was instead U(Y) = Y1/5?
d. Suppose that Bill and Ted instead have different utility functions: Bills utility is given by UB(Y) = Y1/2, and Teds is given by UT(Y) = Y1/2. (This might happen, for example, because Bill has significant disabilities and therefore needs more income to get the same level of utility.) How would a Rawlsian rank the three tax policies now?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started