1. The defendants in the above case argued that the Coca-Cola Trademark was not entitled to protection under the law because the term did not accurately represent the product. Did the Court agree with the Defendant? Explain your response.

1. What, if any, harm could the Coca-Cola Company have suffered as a result of the Koke Company's use of the Name "Koke" to market its products?

1. What if the facts were different? Suppose that Coca-Cola had been trying to make the public believe that its product contained cocaine? 
2. Would the result in the case likely have been different? Explain your response.