Question
The descriptives for following scales: RCT total RSC total DES total RUS total SUS total BFI Neuroticism BFI Agreeableness The correlations between RCT total and
- The descriptives for following scales:
- RCT total
- RSC total
- DES total
- RUS total
- SUS total
- BFI Neuroticism
- BFI Agreeableness
- The correlations between
- RCT total and RSC total
- RUS total and SUS total
- DES total and BFI Neuroticism, BFI Agreeableness
- AGE and RUS
- T-test analysis for
- SEX and BFI Neuroticism
- SEX and DES total
- SEX and RUS
- SEX and SUS
- Follow all of the steps below to complete the assignment:
- The descriptives for following scales:
- Descriptive statistics information includes: the mean, standard deviation and range of scores for each variable. (Descriptive Statistics)
- Inferential statistics reportthe Pearson (r)correlations between the variables and the significance level (p-value). Report the correct values and statistics for thet-test, including significance level for significantt's. (Inferential Statistics)
- Please pay attention to how the Results sections are written in the empirical journal articles. Even though you are not writing the whole paper at this point, make sure that this section flows as though it was part of an entire paper.
info
RCT_total
Case Processing Summary | |||
N | % | ||
Cases | Valid | 238 | 87.5 |
Excludeda | 34 | 12.5 | |
Total | 272 | 100.0 | |
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. |
Scale: RSC_total
Case Processing Summary | |||
N | % | ||
Cases | Valid | 247 | 90.8 |
Excludeda | 25 | 9.2 | |
Total | 272 | 100.0 | |
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. |
Scale: DES_total
Case Processing Summary | |||
N | % | ||
Cases | Valid | 262 | 96.3 |
Excludeda | 10 | 3.7 | |
Total | 272 | 100.0 | |
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. |
Scale: RUS_total
Case Processing Summary | |||
N | % | ||
Cases | Valid | 251 | 92.3 |
Excludeda | 21 | 7.7 | |
Total | 272 | 100.0 | |
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. |
Scale: SUS_total
Case Processing Summary | |||
N | % | ||
Cases | Valid | 256 | 94.1 |
Excludeda | 16 | 5.9 | |
Total | 272 | 100.0 | |
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. |
Scale: Neuroticism
Case Processing Summary | |||
N | % | ||
Cases | Valid | 252 | 92.6 |
Excludeda | 20 | 7.4 | |
Total | 272 | 100.0 | |
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. |
Scale: Agreeableness
Case Processing Summary | |||
N | % | ||
Cases | Valid | 262 | 96.3 |
Excludeda | 10 | 3.7 | |
Total | 272 | 100.0 | |
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure. |
Correlations | ||||
Neuroticism | Agreeableness | SCO_total | ||
Neuroticism | Pearson Correlation | 1 | -.418** | .239** |
Sig. (2-tailed) | <.001 | <.001 | ||
N | 252 | 246 | 246 | |
Agreeableness | Pearson Correlation | -.418** | 1 | .020 |
Sig. (2-tailed) | <.001 | .746 | ||
N | 246 | 262 | 255 | |
SCO_total | Pearson Correlation | .239** | .020 | 1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) | <.001 | .746 | ||
N | 246 | 255 | 261 | |
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). |
Correlations
Correlations | |||
RCT_total | RSC_total | ||
RCT_total | Pearson Correlation | 1 | .719** |
Sig. (2-tailed) | <.001 | ||
N | 238 | 219 | |
RSC_total | Pearson Correlation | .719** | 1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) | <.001 | ||
N | 219 | 247 | |
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). |
Correlations | ||||
DES_total | Neuroticism | Agreeableness | ||
DES_total | Pearson Correlation | 1 | .510** | -.388** |
Sig. (2-tailed) | <.001 | <.001 | ||
N | 262 | 246 | 255 | |
Neuroticism | Pearson Correlation | .510** | 1 | -.418** |
Sig. (2-tailed) | <.001 | <.001 | ||
N | 246 | 252 | 246 | |
Agreeableness | Pearson Correlation | -.388** | -.418** | 1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) | <.001 | <.001 | ||
N | 255 | 246 | 262 | |
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). |
T-Test
Notes | ||
Output Created | 12-MAR-2023 12:09:52 | |
Comments | ||
Input | Data | C:\Users\aL515884\Downloads\Practice_RTS_dating (1).sav |
Active Dataset | DataSet2 | |
Filter | ||
Weight | ||
Split File | ||
N of Rows in Working Data File | 272 | |
Missing Value Handling | Definition of Missing | User defined missing values are treated as missing. |
Cases Used | Statistics for each analysis are based on the cases with no missing or out-of-range data for any variable in the analysis. | |
Syntax | T-TEST GROUPS=sex(1 2) /MISSING=ANALYSIS /VARIABLES=Neuroticism DES_total RUS_total SUS_total /ES DISPLAY(TRUE) /CRITERIA=CI(.95). | |
Resources | Processor Time | 00:00:00.00 |
Elapsed Time | 00:00:00.01 |
Group Statistics | |||||
sex | N | Mean | Std. Deviation | Std. Error Mean | |
Neuroticism | male | 94 | 20.9255 | 5.29605 | .54625 |
female | 158 | 23.2278 | 6.54713 | .52086 | |
DES_total | male | 99 | 18.5556 | 6.36352 | .63956 |
female | 163 | 18.1656 | 7.56067 | .59220 | |
RUS_total | male | 90 | 73.7222 | 14.31039 | 1.50845 |
female | 161 | 80.0807 | 13.34493 | 1.05173 | |
SUS_total | male | 95 | 53.4211 | 10.40415 | 1.06744 |
female | 161 | 58.1304 | 9.31808 | .73437 |
Independent Samples Test | |||||
Levene's Test for Equality of Variances | t-test for Equality of Means | ||||
F | Sig. | t | df | ||
Neuroticism | Equal variances assumed | 7.148 | .008 | -2.892 | 250 |
Equal variances not assumed | -3.050 | 227.562 | |||
DES_total | Equal variances assumed | 2.142 | .145 | .429 | 260 |
Equal variances not assumed | .447 | 234.020 | |||
RUS_total | Equal variances assumed | .859 | .355 | -3.527 | 249 |
Equal variances not assumed | -3.458 | 173.726 | |||
SUS_total | Equal variances assumed | .703 | .403 | -3.740 | 254 |
Equal variances not assumed | -3.635 | 180.308 |
Independent Samples Test | |||||
t-test for Equality of Means | |||||
Significance | Mean Difference | Std. Error Difference | |||
One-Sided p | Two-Sided p | ||||
Neuroticism | Equal variances assumed | .002 | .004 | -2.30232 | .79611 |
Equal variances not assumed | .001 | .003 | -2.30232 | .75477 | |
DES_total | Equal variances assumed | .334 | .668 | .38991 | .90890 |
Equal variances not assumed | .328 | .655 | .38991 | .87163 | |
RUS_total | Equal variances assumed | <.001 | <.001 | -6.35852 | 1.80283 |
Equal variances not assumed | <.001 | <.001 | -6.35852 | 1.83890 | |
SUS_total | Equal variances assumed | <.001 | <.001 | -4.70938 | 1.25934 |
Equal variances not assumed | <.001 | <.001 | -4.70938 | 1.29566 |
Independent Samples Test | |||
t-test for Equality of Means | |||
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference | |||
Lower | Upper | ||
Neuroticism | Equal variances assumed | -3.87025 | -.73439 |
Equal variances not assumed | -3.78955 | -.81508 | |
DES_total | Equal variances assumed | -1.39983 | 2.17965 |
Equal variances not assumed | -1.32732 | 2.10715 | |
RUS_total | Equal variances assumed | -9.90926 | -2.80779 |
Equal variances not assumed | -9.98798 | -2.72907 | |
SUS_total | Equal variances assumed | -7.18946 | -2.22930 |
Equal variances not assumed | -7.26599 | -2.15278 |
Independent Samples Effect Sizes | |||||
Standardizera | Point Estimate | 95% Confidence Interval | |||
Lower | Upper | ||||
Neuroticism | Cohen's d | 6.11172 | -.377 | -.634 | -.119 |
Hedges' correction | 6.13013 | -.376 | -.632 | -.119 | |
Glass's delta | 6.54713 | -.352 | -.609 | -.093 | |
DES_total | Cohen's d | 7.13307 | .055 | -.195 | .304 |
Hedges' correction | 7.15373 | .055 | -.195 | .304 | |
Glass's delta | 7.56067 | .052 | -.198 | .301 | |
RUS_total | Cohen's d | 13.69783 | -.464 | -.725 | -.203 |
Hedges' correction | 13.73926 | -.463 | -.723 | -.202 | |
Glass's delta | 13.34493 | -.476 | -.739 | -.213 | |
SUS_total | Cohen's d | 9.73415 | -.484 | -.740 | -.226 |
Hedges' correction | 9.76301 | -.482 | -.738 | -.226 | |
Glass's delta | 9.31808 | -.505 | -.764 | -.245 | |
a. The denominator used in estimating the effect sizes. Cohen's d uses the pooled standard deviation. Hedges' correction uses the pooled standard deviation, plus a correction factor. Glass's delta uses the sample standard deviation of the control group. |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started