Question
The dissent in the U.S. Supreme Court case of Citizens United questioned who is speaking when corporations endorse or attack political candidates. This portion of
The dissent in the U.S. Supreme Court case of Citizens United questioned who is speaking when corporations endorse or attack political candidates. This portion of the dissent made the following points: Group of answer choices
A.It cannot realistically be said to be the shareholders, who tend to be far removed from the day-to-day decisions of the firm and whose political preferences may be opaque to management.
B.Perhaps the officers or directors of the corporation have the best claim to be the ones speaking, except their fiduciary duties generally prohibit them from using corporate funds for personal ends.
C.Take away the ability to use general treasury funds for some of those ads, and no one's autonomy, dignity, or political equality has been impinged upon in the least.
D.All of these
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started