The estimated purchase price for the equipment required to move the operation in-house would be $900,000. Additional net working capital to support production (in the form of cash used in Inventory, AR net of AP) would be needed in the amount of $40,000 per year starting in year 0 and through all years of the project to support production as raw materials will be required in year o and all years to run the new equipment and produce components to replace those purchased from the vendor.. The current spending on this component (i.e. annual spend pool) is $1,500,000. The estimated cash flow savings of bringing the process in-house is 20% or annual savings of $300,000. This includes the additional labor and overhead costs required. Finally, the equipment required is anticipated to have a somewhat short useful life, as a new wave of technology is on the horizon. Therefore, it is anticipated that the equipment will be sold after the end of the project (the last year of generated cash flow) for $50,000. (i.e. the terminal value).

Cassie from Engineering believes we use a higher Discount Rate because of the risk of this type of project. As such, she is recommending a 5-year project life and flat annual savings. Cassie suggests that even though the equipment is brand new, the updated production process could have a negative impact on other parts of the overall manufacturing costs. She argues that, while it is difficult to quantify the potential negative impacts, to account for the risk, a 15% discount rate should be used. Being an engineer, Cassie feels that the stated terminal value is low based on her experience, and is recommending a $75,000 terminal value,