The first ethical decision$-$making model I would recommend is the utilitarian approach. This approach focuses on the outcomes of a decision, and the goal is to choose the option that will produce the most good or the least amount of harm. In other words, the goal is to maximize utility.

The second ethical decision$-$making model I would recommend is the deontological approach. This approach focuses on the duties and obligations that we have. The goal is to choose the option that best upholds our duties and obligations.

Both of these models can be used to address an ethical conflict faced by the client. The utilitarian approach could be used to look at the different options and choose the one that will produce the most good or the least amount of harm. The deontological approach could be used to look at the different options and choose the one that best upholds our duties and obligations.

The benefits of the utilitarian approach are that it is relatively easy to use and it takes into account the outcomes of a decision. The benefits of the deontological approach are that it is relatively easy to use and it takes into account our duties and obligations. The limitations of the utilitarian approach are that it does not always take into account our duties and obligations, and it can be difficult to determine what the most good or the least amount of harm is$.$ The limitations of the deontological approach are that it can be difficult to determine what our duties and obligations are, and it does not always take into account the outcomes of a decision