The following appeared in a memorandum from the business department of the Apogee Company: "When the Apogee Company had all its operations in one location, it was more profitable than it is today. Therefore, the Apogee Company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location. Such centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all employees." Discuss how well reasoned . . . et. You must point out why the argument presented in the passage is illogical, what type of logical fallacy is it, according to Informed Arguments? AND how to make it valid or logically correct. Understanding "logical fallacy" from Informed Arguments is crucial. Your analysis should be about 500 words in length