The following provides a brief description of the history of Crayola's "flesh" color:

"What color is flesh? According to Welter, it's the lightly pigmented, roughly universal shade we see on our palms like the Crayola crayon by that name. For most people, however, flesh refers to skin tone, and the problem with making one beige-y shade the only skin-tone crayon available is obvious. But until the early 1960s, Welter explained, the company hadn't yet realized how the name could cause consternation. A social researcher noticed children using the shade to draw people, teasing darker-skinned classmates who didn't match the crayon. Shortly after the researcher wrote a letter to the company in 1962, (after a couple back-and-forth years with the name Pink Beige, for some reason) the Crayola shade became known as Peach." (from Huffpost, May 22, 2015, huffpost.com)

Explain the relationship between language and perception implied in this description based on the two principles of Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. Which of the two principles do you think is supported in Crayola's decision? Why?