the following: Question 5 Suppose that Alexis and Beebee enter into a contract in writing for the sale of a violin that is induced by Beebee's honest but mistaken belief that the violin is a "Stradivarius" (i.e. one of the rare violins crafted by Antonio Stradivari in the 17th and 18th century). The terms of the contract clearly state that the violin in question was crafted in the 20th century. When Beebee seeks rescission of the contract, Alexis informs her that he knew of her mistake, but did not inform her prior to entry into the contract. How would this mistake be classified? As a mutual mistake As a common mistake As a unilateral mistake As a synallagmatic mistake 1 points Question 6 Suppose that Alexis and Beebee enter into a contract in writing for the sale of a violin that is induced by Beebee's honest but mistaken belief that the violin is a "Stradivarius" (i.e. one of the rare violins crafted by Antonio Stradivari in the 17th and 18th century). The terms of the contract clearly state that the violin in question was crafted in the 20th century. When Beebee seeks rescission of the contract, Alexis informs her that he knew of her mistake, but did not inform her prior to entry into the contract. Do these facts give us any grounds for thinking that the contract is void ab initio? Select only one answer. Yes, the contract may be declared void ab initio if it can be shown that Alexis deliberately set out to ensure that Beebee did not bec