The government obtains a search warrant, and the warrant authorizes police to search for instrumentalities of computer harassment and photographs indicative of this offense, which involves communicating "obscene, vulgar, profane, lewd, lascivious, or indecent language," or making a "suggesting or proposal of an obscene nature," or threatening an "illegal or immoral act." During the search, the police find child pornography on the defendant's computer. The defendant argues that the seizure of child pornography during a computer search for evidence of harassment should be excluded under the Fourth Amendment because the evidence was beyond the scope of the search warrant. How should the court decide the case? See United States v Williams (4th Cir 2010). Think from a law professional perspective, not concerned parent or citizen.