The issue of interest to us in Cea v Hoffman was whether a contract had been formed Was there an offer and an acceptance Modular (the defendant behind Hoffman) says no, while Al Laura Cea say yes The trial court agreed with Modular and granted their motion for Summary Judgment Al Laura appealed and the decision was reversed Please provide one group response to the following questions to be submitted by the group leader Modular offered to build the home or refund the deposit Al Laura Cea contend they accepted the offer to build the home but Modular said, no they had not accepted so no contract had been formed What was Modular's reasoning It was agreed that a contract to build the home was not formed Al Laura then contended that they accepted the refund offer thereby creating a contract Modular said the offer of a refund had already been rejected and so no contract could be formed What was Modular's reasoning The appellate court determined that acceptance of the refund offer had taken place and that an enforceable contract had been created What was the court's reasoning

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on Jul 13, 2024

The issue of interest to us in Cea v. Hoffman was whether a contract had been formed.Was there an offer and an acceptance?Modular (the defendant

Theissue of interest to us in Cea v. Hoffman was whether a contract had been formed.Was there an offer and an acceptance?Modular (the defendant behind Hoffman) says "no," while Al & Laura Cea say "yes."The trial court agreed with Modular and granted their motion for Summary Judgment.Al & Laura appealed and the decision was reversed.

Please provide one group response to the following questions to be submitted by the group leader:

Modular offered to build the home or refund the deposit. Al & Laura Cea contend they accepted the offer to build the home but Modular said, "no" they had not accepted so no contract had been formed.WhatwasModular'sreasoning?
It was agreed that a contract to build the home was not formed. Al & Laura then contended that they accepted the refund offer thereby creating a contract.Modular said the offer of a refund had already been rejected and so no contract could be formed.WhatwasModular'sreasoning?
The appellate court determined thatacceptance of the refund offer had taken placeand that an enforceable contract had been created.What was the court's reasoning?