The law firm of Traystman, Coric and Keramidas represented Andrew Daigle in a divorce in Norwich, Connecticut. Scott McGowan, an attorney with the firm, handled the two-day trial. After the first day of the trial, McGowan told Daigle to sign a promissory note in the amount of $26,973, which represented the amount that Daigle then owed to the firm, or McGowan would withdraw from the case, and Daigle would be forced to get another attorney or to continue the trial by himself. Daigle said that he wanted another attorney, Martin Rutchik, to see the note. McGowan urged Daigle to sign it and assured him that a copy would be sent to Rutchik. Feeling that he had no other choice, Daigle signed the note. When he did not pay, the law firm filed a suit in a Connecticut state court against him. Daigle asserted that the note was unenforceable because he had signed it under duress

Test Information Description The law firm of Traystman, Coric and Keramidas represented Andrew Daigle in a divorce in Norwich, Connecticut. Scott McGowan, an attorney with the firm, handled the two- day trial. After the first day of the trial, McGowan told Daigle to sign a promissory note in the amount of $26,973, which represented the amount that Daigle then owed to the firm, or McGowan would withdraw from the case, and Daigle would be forced to get another attorney or to continue the trial by himself. Daigle said that he wanted another attorney, Martin Rutchik, to see the note. McGowan urged Daigle to sign it and assured him that a copy would be sent to Rutchik. Feeling that he had no other choice, Daigle signed the note. When he did not pay, the law firm filed a suit in a Connecticut state court against him. Daigle asserted that the note was unenforceable because he had signed it under duress. [Traystman, Coric and Keramidas v. Daigle, 84 Conn.App. 843, 855 A.2d 996 (2004)] 1 . Instructions Multiple This test allows 2 attempts. This is attempt number 1. Attempts Force This test can be saved and resumed later. Completion Your answers are saved automatically. Question Completion Status: QUESTION 1 10 points Save Answer This case will be brought it v court. criminal civilQUESTION 2 The plaintiff(s) in this case is/are V and the defendant(s) is/are Traysman, Coric and Keramidas Andrew Daigle Andrew Daigle's wife QUESTION 3 Martin RutchikQUESTION 2 The plaintiff(s) in this case is/are and the defendant(s) is/are V Traysman, Coric and Keramidas Andrew Daigle Andrew Daigle's wife QUESTION 3 Martin Rutchik