The legislative history of Grass Pants City Council, specifically, Delores Umbridge and her perspective and remarks could provide a look into the intent behind the city ordinance. Umbridge's concern regarding, "rambunctious children" causing accidents involving park goers, specifically with bicycles or scooters appears to focus on behaviors that disrupt the safety of others. In the case of Harry Potter, while skateboards are not implicitly mentioned, could plausibly fall under that same category as a bicycle or scooter which are used as a form of transportation which would then pose the same risks. Due to this, applying the statute could apply to Harry's case and justify his arrest. In Luna Lovegood's case her outcome could be different based on the statute. Being a four year-old, a tricycle seems far less likely to represent a rambunctious child described by Umbridge. A tricycle is a child's toy and less likely to carry the risk a normal bicycle would be interms of speed and hazard to park goers safety. It can be argued the statute would not apply to young children or tricycles thus nullifying Luna's arrest. Question 2: The City Council Transportation Committee reported that motorized vehicles were mainly the cause of most accidents in the park. Since the report focused on motorized vehicles, it could be argued the legislative intent was more focused on emphasizing its concern with preventing accidents that were a result of powerful moving vehicles. The skateboard ridden by Harry and Luna's tricycle were both non-motorized, meaning they would not likely fall under the con