The links attached have information regarding my question, you can use them for reference.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/18/zuckerberg-facebook-holocaust-deniers-censorship

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/oct/16/facebook-political-activism-pages-inauthentic-behavior-censorship

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/oct/17/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-free-expression-speech

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/jun/02/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-trump-protests-violence

Legally speaking ( using terms that apply to law), is CEO Mark Zuckerburg correct when he defends Facebook's "free expression" philosophy? Give an explanation as to why he is correct in defending the philosophy. Give an explanation as to why he is wrong when defending the philosophy. How does the first amendment and the prior restraint relate to his defense about the "free expression" philosophy. How would you defend mark zuckerburg using legal terms (not ethically speaking but, legally speaking.) How would you prosecute mark Zuckerburg using legal terms ( not ethically speaking, but legally speaking)