The main trouble with U5, which states that an act is right if and only if it produces the greatest pleasure for the greatest number of people, is that Select one: O it requires us to minimize two independent variables, the amount of pain and the number of people who are harmed it requires us to synchronize two independent variables, pain and pleasure it requires us to eliminate all pain it requires us to maximize two independent variables, the amount of happiness and the number of people None of the above. Michael Sandel uses the Phillip Morris and Ford Pinto cases to show Select one: O how rule utilitarianism is deficient as a theory of morality how conventionalism cannot deal adequately with complex business practices that moral objectivism is superior to any other alternative that Mill's version of classical act utilitarianism is an improvement on Bentham's examples of cost/benefit analysis