The majority made much of the fact that Ford's contacts were "continuous" rather than "isolated." Recall that the distinction between "continuous and systematic" contacts versus contacts that are "isolated and sporadic" has its roots in International Shoe. Since International Shoe, has the Court made much of this distinction in resolving specific jurisdiction cases? What is the dividing line between labelling contacts as continuous rather than isolated? Does the majority's opinion provide any guidance on how to make that determination? What is the import of this distinction? Is it that if the contacts are "continuous" then the bar for "relates to" is lower than if the contacts are "isolated"? What, if anything, does the majority have to say about this