Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

THE MAN WHO SHOCKED THE WORLD In July 1961, a psychologist at Yale University, Dr. Stanley Milgram, a 28-year-old Harvard graduate with a PhD

image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
\ THE MAN WHO SHOCKED THE WORLD In July 1961, a psychologist at Yale University, Dr. Stanley Milgram, a 28-year-old Harvard graduate with a PhD in social psychology, began a series of experiments that were destined to shock the psychological community and reveal some disturbing insights into the capacity of the human race to inflict harm on one another. Participants in the experiments were members of the general public who had responded to a newspaper advertisement for volunteers in an experiment on punishment and learning. The "teacher" in the experiment (one of Milgram's team of researchers) instructed the participants to inflict increasingly powerful electric shocks on a test "learner" every time the learner gave an incorrect answer to a word-matching task. The shocks started, in theory, at the low level of 15 volts and increased in 15-volt increments up to a potentially fatal shock of 450 volts, In reality, the voltage machine was an elaborate stage prop, and the learner was an actor screaming and imitating physical suffering as the voltage level of each shock appeared to increase. The participants were told about the deception at the end of the experience, but during the experiment they were led to believe that the voltage and the pain being inflicted were real. The teacher used no force or intimidation in the experiment other than maintaining an air of academic seriousness. The experiment was repeated more than 20 times using hundreds of research subjects. In every case the majority of the subjects failed to stop shocking the learners, even when they believed they were inflicting a potentially fatal voltage and the learner had apparently stopped screaming with pain. Some did plead to stop the test, and others argued with the teacher that the experiment was going wrong. but in the end, the majority of them obeyed the instructions of the teacher to the letter. It's important to remind ourselves that these research participants were not criminals or psychopaths with a documented history of sadistic behavior. They were average Americans who responded to an ad and came in off the street to take part. What Milgram's research appears to tell us is that people are capable of suspending their own individual morality to someone in authority-even killing someone just because they were instructed to do it. Milgram's research shocked the academic world and generated heated debate about the ethical conduct of the study and the value of the results in comparison to the harm inflicted on the research participants who were led to believe that it was all really happening. That debate continues to this day, even though subsequent repetitions of the study in various formats have validated Milgram's original findings. Almost 50 years later, we are faced with research data that suggest ordinary human beings are capable of performing destructive and inhumane acts without any physical threat of harm to themselves. As Thomas Boss commented. "While we would like to belleve that when confronted with a moral dilemma we will act as our conscience dictates. Milgram's obedience experiments teach us that in a concrete situation with powerful social constraints, our moral senses can easily be trampled." In 2015, Magnolia Pictures released the movie Experimenter, starring Peter Sarsgaard as Milgram. The movie documents Milgram's surprise and alarm at how many of the study participants were willing to proceed to the highest level of electric shocks, despite their personal reservations, because the formal design of the experiment required them to. It aiso examines the objections and concerns that Milgram's research prompted in the academic community, resulting in Milgram's denial for tenure at Harvard after his research approaches were deemed to be unethical. 6. Do you think if the study were repeated today we would get the same kind of results? Why

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

A First Course in Quantitative Finance

Authors: Thomas Mazzoni

1st edition

9781108411431, 978-1108419574

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

Rolling friction explain?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Sliding friction explain?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Define ISI.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Describe the Indian public distribution system.

Answered: 1 week ago