The McWane Case: From January 8-10, 2003, the New York Times ran a three-part series on massive occupational safety and health violations at facilities owned by McWane, Inc. The company, based in Birmingham Alabama, is a large and profitable operator of foundries. The series tells the story of corporate indifference to a horrific record of employee injuries and deaths. A video of a program on McWane that was aired on PBS in early 2003 (A Dangerous Business) is also available (it runs about 55 minutes). I am including a link to the updated video here: McWane: A Dangerous Business Revisited Plain Text URL: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/mcwane/ You may (1) watch the video above, or (2) do some research into the McWane OSHA violation to answer the following questions: (The video is about 55 min., you may want to have this open while you watch to take notes.) 1) What does the McWane saga tell us about the limitations of each of the following as means of protecting the safety and health of employees? (Pick TWO to discuss.) 1) The law and regulatory agencies? 2) Labor unions? 3) The labor market? 2) Why wasnt OSHA more effective in dealing with McWane? Are the penalties that OSHA can impose sufficient to deal with employers like McWane? 3) Does investing in the safety of employees pay off for employers or not? 4) Discuss the professional ethical issues involved? Should OSHA even be necessary? 5) What do you think about how the video ended? Do you think McWane Inc. changed