The mean salary of federal government employees on the General Schedule is $59,593. The average salary of 30 state employees who do similar work is $58,800 with= $1500. At the 0.01 level of significance, can it be concluded that state employees earn on average less than federal employees?

The mean age of Senators in the 109th Congress was 60.35 years. A random sample of 40 senators from various state senates had an average age of 55.4 years, and the population standard deviation is 6.5 years. At= 0.05, is there sufficient evidence that state senators are on average younger than the Senators in Washington?

Flag question: Question 1Question 11 pts

The mean salary of federal government employees on the General Schedule is $59,593. The average salary of 30 state employees who do similar work is $58,800 with= $1500. At the 0.01 level of significance, can it be concluded that state employees earn on average less than federal employees?

Which of the following are the right hypotheses?

a) H0=58800H158800H0=58800H158800

b)H0=58800H1>58800H0=58800H1>58800

c) H0=58800H1<58800H0=58800H1<58800

d) H0=59,593H159,593H0=59,593H159,593

e) H0=59,593H1>59,593H0=59,593H1>59,593

f)H0=59,593H1<59,593H0=59,593H1<59,593

Group of answer choices

c

a

e

d

f

b

Flag question: Question 2Question 21 pts

The mean salary of federal government employees on the General Schedule is $59,593. The average salary of 30 state employees who do similar work is $58,800 with= $1500. At the 0.01 level of significance, can it be concluded that state employees earn on average less than federal employees?

The test is [ Select ] ["left-tailed test", "two-tailed test", "right-tailed test"]

Flag question: Question 3Question 31 pts

Find the p-value, using the following information.

The test statistic in a left-tailed test is z = -1.25.

Flag question: Question 4Question 41 pts

The mean salary of federal government employees on the General Schedule is $59,593. The average salary of 30 state employees who do similar work is $58,800 with= $1500. At the 0.01 level of significance, can it be concluded that state employees earn on average less than federal employees?

What distribution should be used in hypotheses testing?

Group of answer choices

t distribution

normal distribution

Flag question: Question 5Question 51 pts

The mean salary of federal government employees on the General Schedule is $59,593. The average salary of 30 state employees who do similar work is $58,800 with= $1500. At the 0.01 level of significance, can it be concluded that state employees earn on average less than federal employees?

What is the critical value? Round your answer to the nearest hundredths.

Flag question: Question 6Question 61 pts

The mean salary of federal government employees on the General Schedule is $59,593. The average salary of 30 state employees who do similar work is $58,800 with= $1500. At the 0.01 level of significance, can it be concluded that state employees earn on average less than federal employees?

What is the statistic value? Round your answer to the nearest hundredths.

Flag question: Question 7Question 71 pts

The mean salary of federal government employees on the General Schedule is $59,593. The average salary of 30 state employees who do similar work is $58,800 with= $1500. At the 0.01 level of significance, can it be concluded that state employees earn on average less than federal employees?

Would you

Group of answer choices

reject the null hypothesis

fail to reject the null hypothesis

Flag question: Question 8Question 81 pts

The mean salary of federal government employees on the General Schedule is $59,593. The average salary of 30 state employees who do similar work is $58,800 with= $1500. At the 0.01 level of significance, can it be concluded that state employees earn on average less than federal employees?

Which of the following is a correct conclusion:

a) There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim thatstate employees earn on average less than federal employees.

b) There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim thatstate employees earn on average less than federal employees.

c) The sample data support the claim thatstate employees earn on average less than federal employees

d) There is not sufficient sample evidence to support the claim thatstate employees earn on average less than federal employees.

Group of answer choices

d

b

c

a

Flag question: Question 9Question 91 pts

The mean salary of federal government employees on the General Schedule is $59,593. The average salary of 30 state employees who do similar work is $58,800 with= $1500. At the 0.01 level of significance, can it be concluded that state employees earn on average less than federal employees?

Find p-value. Round it to the nearest thousandths.

Flag question: Question 10Question 101 pts

The mean age of Senators in the 109th Congress was 60.35 years. A random sample of 40 senators from various state senates had an average age of 55.4 years, and the population standard deviation is 6.5 years. At= 0.05, is there sufficient evidence that state senators are on average younger than the Senators in Washington?

Which of the following are the right hypotheses?

a) H0=60.35H160.35H0=60.35H160.35

b) H0=60.35H1>60.35H0=60.35H1>60.35

c) H0=60.35H1<60.35H0=60.35H1<60.35

d) H0=55.4H155.4H0=55.4H155.4

e) H0=55.4H1>55.4H0=55.4H1>55.4

f)H0=55.4H1<55.4H0=55.4H1<55.4

Group of answer choices

b

e

d

f

c

a

Flag question: Question 11Question 111 pts

The mean age of Senators in the 109th Congress was 60.35 years. A random sample of 40 senators from various state senates had an average age of 55.4 years, and the population standard deviation is 6.5 years. At= 0.05, is there sufficient evidence that state senators are on average younger than the Senators in Washington?

We should use [ Select ] ["right-tailed test", "left-tailed test", "two-tailed test"]

Flag question: Question 12Question 121 pts

The mean age of Senators in the 109th Congress was 60.35 years. A random sample of 40 senators from various state senates had an average age of 55.4 years, and the population standard deviation is 6.5 years. At= 0.05, is there sufficient evidence that state senators are on average younger than the Senators in Washington?

What distribution should be used in hypotheses testing?

Group of answer choices

normal distribution

t distribution

Flag question: Question 13Question 131 pts

The mean age of Senators in the 109th Congress was 60.35 years. A random sample of 40 senators from various state senates had an average age of 55.4 years, and the population standard deviation is 6.5 years. At= 0.05, is there sufficient evidence that state senators are on average younger than the Senators in Washington?

What is the critical value? Round your answer to the nearest hundredths.

Flag question: Question 14Question 141 pts

The mean age of Senators in the 109th Congress was 60.35 years. A random sample of 40 senators from various state senates had an average age of 55.4 years, and the population standard deviation is 6.5 years. At= 0.05, is there sufficient evidence that state senators are on average younger than the Senators in Washington?

What is the statistic value? Round your answer to the nearest hundredths.

Flag question: Question 15Question 151 pts

The mean age of Senators in the 109th Congress was 60.35 years. A random sample of 40 senators from various state senates had an average age of 55.4 years, and the population standard deviation is 6.5 years. At= 0.05, is there sufficient evidence that state senators are on average younger than the Senators in Washington?

Would you

Group of answer choices

reject the null hypothesis

fail to reject the null hypothesis

Flag question: Question 16Question 161 pts

The mean age of Senators in the 109th Congress was 60.35 years. A random sample of 40 senators from various state senates had an average age of 55.4 years, and the population standard deviation is 6.5 years. At= 0.05, is there sufficient evidence that state senators are on average younger than the Senators in Washington?

Which of the following is a correct conclusion:

a) There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that state senators are on average younger than the Senators in Washington

b) There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that state senators are on average younger than the Senators in Washington

c) The sample data support the claim that state senators are on average younger than the Senators in Washington

d) There is not sufficient sample evidence to support the claim thatstate senators are on average younger than the Senators in Washington

Group of answer choices

b

c

d

a

Flag question: Question 17Question 171 pts

The mean age of Senators in the 109th Congress was 60.35 years. A random sample of 40 senators from various state senates had an average age of 55.4 years, and the population standard deviation is 6.5 years. At= 0.05, is there sufficient evidence that state senators are on average younger than the Senators in Washington?

Find p-value. Round it to the nearest hundredths.