The Newfoundland Labrador English School District employs 90 cleaners. The cleaners are responsible for school classrooms, hallways, offices and some exterior maintenance work, such as snow shoveling. The cleaners' job duties include lifting 22 kg pails that contain 5 gallons of cleaner and to stack them three pails high in the supply room. The job also includes lifting 21 kg boxes of paper, which are stacked 5 boxes high. It was estimated that the lifting was an occasional demand that accounted for about 13% of each shift. The school board established a job specification that the cleaners must be able to lift 23 kg from floor to shoulder height. The board established a lifting test to determine if candidates could meet the required standard. Three individuals, Sharon, Lucy, and Colleen, were offered jobs as cleaners. The employment offers were conditional upon the candidates passing a physical demands assessment, which included the lifting test. When it was established that the three candidates could not pass the test because they were only able to lift 16 kgs, their offers of employment were withdrawn. The union representing the cleaners filed a grievance challenging the 23 kg lifting job qualification. At a grievance meeting, it was established that 9 of 68 women and 2 of 245 men who had previously taken the test had failed. It was also found that four of the nine women who initially failed the test passed after being provided training and an opportunity to retake the test. At the arbitration hearing, the union provided evidence establishing that some cleaners took bundles of paper out of the boxes in the stacking process. Also, the cleaning supplies could be ordered in cases containing 4 one-gallon containers, which weighed 4.5 kgs each. Buying the cleaning supplies in the smaller containers increased the cost by 10%. The employer argued that the 23 kg lifting requirement was a safety issue, and it was the same for all candidates. The employer provided evidence that it was in financial difficulty and had to cut costs wherever possible. Is there discrimination in this situation? Why or why not? Support your answer. Assume that you are the decision maker in this situation. What would your decision be? Provide reasons for your decision.