The original document states:

Even if, as the majority holds, the ordinances implicate the fundamental rights of minors, they should be subjected only to intermediate scrutiny. This standard asks whether the ordinance is substantially related to important governmental interests.State v. J.P., 907 So. 2d 1101, 1131 (Fla. 2004) (Cantero, J., dissenting).

The paraphrased document reads:

Intermediate scrutiny is the appropriate standard to use in determining the validity of the ordinances at issue in this case. Intermediate scrutiny looks for a substantial relationship between the ordinance and the government's need for that ordinance.State v. J.P., 907 So. 2d 1101 1131 (Fla. 2004) (Cantero, J., dissenting).

Do you think the paraphrasing has been done correctly?

Yes

No