the plaintiff alleged he sustained injuries when the pizza delivery car in which he was a passanger crashed into a utility pole. the plaintiff and two other men had stolen the pizza delivery car when the driver of the car let the engine running while making a delivery. the plaintiff alleged that the driver and the pizza company were negligent in failing to ensure that the car would not be stolen while making a delivery the judge dismissed the case statung that at some juncture, which can not be defined in unequivocal terms the links that bund together the causal chain connecting conduct to injury must be served.

PRACTICAL APPLICATION 9.3 The plaintiff alleged he sustained kal delivery car in which he was a passenger crashed into a utility pole! The plant jan other men had stole pizza delivery car when the driver of the car et thee making a delivery. The plaintiff alleged that the driver and the pizza company were negligentin failing to ensure that the car would not be stolen While making a delivery The judge dismissed the case stating that at some juncture which cannot be defined in unequiv ocal terms, the links that bind together the causal chain connecting conduct to injury must be severed! Point for Discussion: One could say that but for the driver leaving the car running, the plaintiff would not have stolen the car and been injured. Do you agree with the judge that the causal chain has been severed in this case