The plani manager then showed the clase the followins information.

$\backslash$table$[[,$Kechup,Mustard,Rolish$],[$Curient priority based on CM perunit,$41,13,42],[$Bctuling tinge $($hours per unit$),0\mathrm{.}01,0\mathrm{.}005,0\mathrm{.}02],[$Yarlable cost per unit,$$0\mathrm{.}95,$$$0\mathrm{.}70,$sa$\mathrm{.}90],[$Manthy demand $($units$),44,000,24,000,9,000]]$

The plant manager then said: "The puzzle I m not sure if we are maxinizing the proftability of our bottling capactiy aningore what do Youthink?

$($b$)$

Your Answer $1$ Correct Answer $($Used$)$

Assume that after the switch to glass bottles, the following cost relationship exist for al three products variable costs are $20\%\%$ of sellins price. Given this information, what must be the current contribution marg in per unil for ceach of the thre paroduct? Further, in what order should the company now rank its products fi terms of profitablity if the boteling activity is its prinary constraint? $($Roundanswers to $2$ dedmal places, es $15,25.)$

$($c$)$

$($c$1)$ Given your new rankings in part $($b$),$ calculate how many bottles $($unils$)$ of each product the company would need to make to maximize profitability, considering the constraint, while not caceeding demand. The bottlng activity operates $191$ ours a day, $28$ days a month of no unif of on ittem is to be produced enter O$.$ Do not leave any field blonki$)$

Units produced within this

Unetchup

time

$($c$2)$ Then, calculate the companys manthly contribution marein under this scenario.

Monthly contrilbution maresin $5$

$($CS$)$ Calailate the mantiny contribution marcin il would hove bere under the prrsious croduction priarity

Monthly canurlibution margin $$

$($ca$)$ Explain the difference in prafil between thoe two sce$$ios if were is any

Front bs $5$The plani manager then showed the clase the followins information.

$\backslash$table$[[,$Kechup,Mustard,Rolish$],[$Curient priority based on CM perunit,$41,13,42],[$Bctuling tinge $($hours per unit$),0\mathrm{.}01,0\mathrm{.}005,0\mathrm{.}02],[$Yarlable cost per unit,$$0\mathrm{.}95,$$$0\mathrm{.}70,$sa$\mathrm{.}90],[$Manthy demand $($units$),44,000,24,000,9,000]]$

The plant manager then said: "The puzzle I m not sure if we are maxinizing the proftability of our bottling capactiy aningore what do Youthink?

$($b$)$

Your Answer $1$ Correct Answer $($Used$)$

Assume that after the switch to glass bottles, the following cost relationship exist for al three products variable costs are $20\%\%$ of sellins price. Given this information, what must be the current contribution marg in per unil for ceach of the thre paroduct? Further, in what order should the company now rank its products fi terms of profitablity if the boteling activity is its prinary constraint? $($Roundanswers to $2$ dedmal places, es $15,25.)$

$($c$)$

$($c$1)$ Given your new rankings in part $($b$),$ calculate how many bottles $($unils$)$ of each product the company would need to make to maximize profitability, considering the constraint, while not caceeding demand. The bottlng activity operates $191$ ours a day, $28$ days a month of no unif of on ittem is to be produced enter O$.$ Do not leave any field blonki$)$

Units produced within this

Unetchup

time

$($c$2)$ Then, calculate the companys manthly contribution marein under this scenario.

Monthly contrilbution maresin $5$

$($CS$)$ Calailate the mantiny contribution marcin il would hove bere under the prrsious croduction priarity

Monthly canurlibution margin $$

$($ca$)$ Explain the difference in prafil between thoe two sce$$ios if were is any

Front bs $5$