Question
The previous data about the death penalty are hypothetical, not based on any real study. However, here are some real data from the FBI's Uniform
The previous data about the death penalty are hypothetical, not based on any real study. However, here are some real data from the FBI's Uniform Crime Report for 2001:
U.S. REGION | MURDER RATE IN 2001 (PER 100,000 PEOPLE) |
---|---|
Northeast | 4.2 |
Midwest | 5.3 |
West | 5.5 |
South | 6.7 |
National average | 5.6 |
There were 0 executions in the Northeast in 2001. In contrast, almost 80% of all of the executions in the United States in 2001 were in the South.
If we use the South as our "death penalty region" and the Northeast as our "no death penalty control group," we could make the claim that the 2001 murder rate is actually significantly higher in Death Penalty states than in non-death-penalty states.
What type of quasi-experimental design would this situation approximate?
nonequivalent control group, posttest only
nonequivalent control group, pretest-posttest
Think critically for a moment. What is missing from this data? What kinds of information would you like to see before you agreed that the death penalty actually increases murder?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started