1. The primary purpose of the enforcement of laws prohibiting the economic adulteration of food is:
   • To censure businesses for creating products with new or different ingredients than what already exists in the marketplace
   • To protect the public from unsafe foods
   • To support the trademarks and patents of food manufacturers as it relates to food production
2. The Supreme Court has held that food not labeled with the distinctive food could be
   • Exempt under the distinctive name proviso of the administrative definitions and standards of identity
   • Confiscated under the Pure Food and Drug Act
   • A violation of the imitation proviso of the administrative definitions and standards of identity
3. Moving away from assessment of the listed ingredients as a way to establish economic adulteration, or food fraud, the standard today in determining whether a food is adulterated is based upon
   • Whether the food is diluted
   • Whether the food is recognized by the ordinary consumer as a food containing certain ingredients
   • Whether the marketing of the food matches the ingredients on the label
4. When a state legislature passes a statute to prevent the manufacture of imitation butter using a particular food coloring, the state statute will be
   • Upheld as not repugnant to the Constitution
   • A violation of the Due Process class as such a state statute operates as an unlawful taking of property
   • A violation of the Dormant Commerce Clause