The recent Supreme Court ruling on the question of whether the NCAA violated antitrust laws by requiring all participating colleges and universities to restrict or refuse student athlete compensation (and other benefits) is provided below, along with other articles or opinion pieces that discussed it.

Choose a case opinion or one of the articles, then share your comments by:

(1) Clearly stating your reasons for agreeing or disagreeing with the court (or the writer of one of these articles)

(2) Describe if you believe this decision has changed or will impact how athletes are handled or recruited.

Who chooses which source to discuss has no restrictions. Anyone may decide to debate any or all of them. Before publishing, I strongly advise you to read more than one of the sources presented here.

SOURCES:

Supreme Court's opinion is available at: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/594/20-512/#tab-opinion-4441784

Justice Kavanagh's concurring opinion, which is more intriguing and incisive, may be found at: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/594/20-512/#tab-opinion-4441783

Additional writings/opinions about it

https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/ncaa-athletes-get-unanimous-win-on-educational-perks-as-kavanaugh-calls-out-limits-on-direct-payments/

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/06/21/supreme-court-rules-against-ncaa-in-landmark-antitrust-case/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2021/06/22/sally-jenkins-supreme-court-ncaa-decision/

The following website has an opinion article (before to the decision): https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/ncaa-earned-some-supreme-court-doubt-over-its-control-student-ncna1262765

One Year of Collegiate Athletics: https://www.jdsupra.com/LegalNews/2970463/ Post Decision Piece

0