The researcher recruited 10,000 man (average age of 50 years) from Texas. Hev insisted on using an alpha of 0.10 instead of the conventional 0.05 level of significance due to his previous null findings. In this sample, he observed a p-value of 0.070 for the association between alcoholism and cancer after an average follow-up of 5 years he concluded that his findings were statistically significant. Can we conclude that his findings are valid, assuming all selection and information bias are kept at a minimum and rigid control for confounding factors were implemented in the analysis?