Question
The results from a feasibility study showed that constructing a new plant would have the best economic feasibility for an organization. However, construction plus relocation
The results from a feasibility study showed that constructing a new plant would have the best economic feasibility for an organization. However, construction plus relocation time will prevent the organization from meeting its time-to-market strategic objective. Assuming viable leasing and building spaces are available, which of the following should the facility manager recommend?
Build the new facility but rush construction and relocation in order to meet time-to-market objectives even if it significantly increases risks of project failure.
Cancel the strategic plans and re-perform strategic facility studies until a solution is found that can feasibly address all strategic objectives.
Build the new facility on the original schedule because it is more important to meet long-term cost goals than a time-to-market objective.
Lease and modify an existing facility (even if it costs more but is still economically feasible), as long as it gets production capacity available soon enough to meet the organization's time-to-market objectives.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started