the rule, argu$-$mercial speechThe trial courtealed.PINION Thet of Columbiaor of RJR$.$ Theand ruled thatdence that theeech, directlyinterest. Thepurely factualning informa$-$the impact ofnded to gener$-$he FDA couldl Hudson testthe 'international consensus' surrounding the effec$-$tiveness of large graphic warnings, but offers ncevidence showing that such warnings have directtycaused a material decrease in smoking rates in anyof the countries that now require them."Case Questions$1.$ Commercial speech is generally analyzed underintermediate$-$level scrutiny rather than understrict scrutiny. Do you think it is appropriate totreat commercial advertising differently thanother forms of speech? Why or why not?$2.$ What did the FDA need to prove in order to pre$-$Vail in this case?$3.$ Focus on Critical Thinking: Do professional ath$-$letes have a constitutional right to neel duringthe national anthem? Why or why not?