The Supreme Court of Arizona decided that $($select $3$ of the following answer options$)$:

a$.$ The fraternity and its officers violated a duty of care not to give alcohol to underage persons.

b$.$ The trial court decision should be upheld.

c$.$ People have a duty of care to avoid providing alcohol to minors.

d$.$ Fraternities and bar owners have a duty of care to those injured by an intoxicated person they served.

e$.$ It is hazardous to provide alcohol to youths because there is a foreseeable risk they will injure themselves or others.