Question
The Supreme Court of Canada distinguishes that duties of care exist between businesses serving alcohol and road users because of the expectation of everyone that
The Supreme Court of Canada distinguishes that duties of care exist between businesses serving alcohol and road users because of the expectation of everyone that alcohol intake is monitored and servers are trained (paragraph 18), the profit motive (paragraphs 20 - 22) and a supervisory relationship (41 - 46: there is no relationship of hosts controlling guests at a party), and says social hosts don't have these same factors present.
Do youpersonallythink that a private person supplying a venue where people are drinking should be sufficient to establish a duty of care to road users (and making them liable to road users for negligence)?Why or why not? Refer to your knowledge of negligence law when answering this question.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started