The topic which needs to be critically evaluated and analysed is TEAM TRUST. Please select 2 Oxford or Harvard scholarly articles and do the following:

what is each article saying at a high-level? what evidence is offered in support of its claims? how robust is this evidence? And/or, what are the limitations of the claims? Are the limitations spelled out?

By synthesising the findings that cut across the articles, and weighing up when robust evidence was given in support of a claim, what are the high-level 'known-known's'?

What claims were made across one or more of the papers that cannot be substantiated with the evidence given.

The answer needs to provide real world modern day examples and comparisons with scholarly intext and 10 end text references in Amercian psychological Association 7th format which are stritcly connected.

Provide at least 2 theories to strenghthen the robust nature of the idea emphasized with modernday examples in the contemporary work place teams.