The town council of Cato Springs is considering two alternative investments to upgrade and expand its spring-fed recreational area. The two investment alternatives (A and B) have different costs and will produce different public benefits. The projected costs and benefits over a 10-year planning horizon for the two alternatives are given below. Using a MARR of 8.0%, which, if either of the alternatives should be pursued by the Cato Springs city council? EOY CF (Costs for Alt A) CF (Benefits for Alt A) CF (Costs for Alt B) CF (Benefits for Alt B) 0 $7,590,000 $10,185,000 1 $2,245,000 $1.250.000 $3,404,500 $1.950,000 2 $500,000 $2,450,000 $650,000 $3,505,900 3 $650,000 $2,858,000 $800,000 $ $3,807,500 4 $800,000 $3,300,800 $950,000 $4,128,200 5 $950.000 $3.505.900 $1,100,000 $4.375,600 6 $1,100,000 $3.731,800 $1,250.000 $4,700,600 7 $1,250,000 $3,991,600 $1,400,000 $5,116,200 8 $1,400,000 $4,362,600 $1,550.000 $5,400,400 9 9 $1,550,000 $5,315,300 $1,700,000 $6,002,700 10 $1,700,000 $6.838.300 $1,850,000 $10,600,600 Determine and rank the present worth of the costs for the alternatives. Click here to access the TVM Factor Table calculator. Alternative A's PW(C) = $ Alternative B's PW(C) = $ Carry all interim calculations to 5 decimal places and then round your final answers to a whole number. The tolerance is $100. has has a smaller present worth of costs, so it should be denoted Alternative 1. Respectively, a higher present worth of costs and should be denoted Alternative 2. Assume that "Do nothing" is Alternative O. Calculate the ratios of present worth of benefits to present worth of costs for each pair of alternatives. Incremental Investment Incremental B/C Alternative to be selected 1-0 Carry all interim calculations to 5 decimal places and then round your final answers to 3 decimal places. The tolerance is +0.005. Based on the results above, which, if either of the alternatives should be pursued by the Cato Springs city council? should be recommended