Question
The two cases that formed the basis for most subsequent decisions as to the determination of auditor negligence were: AWA and HIH. Caparo Industries and
The two cases that formed the basis for most subsequent decisions as to the determination of auditor negligence were:
AWA and HIH. | ||
Caparo Industries and Esanda. | ||
Pacific Acceptance and London and General Bank. | ||
Kingston Cotton Mill and London and General Bank. |
Match the case with the ruling, and choose the correct matching: Cases: Rulings:
Caparo Industries Pty Ltd v. Dickman | A. An auditor is a watchdog, but not a bloodhound |
Kingston Cotton Mill Co. | B. Contributory negligence |
AWA Ltd v. Daniels | C. An auditors duty of care is owed to shareholders as a group, not to individual shareholders |
A, B, C | ||
B, C, A | ||
C, A, B | ||
A, C, B |
The principles established by Justice Moffitt in the Pacific Acceptance case do not include:
auditors have a duty to use reasonable skills and care. | ||
auditors must properly document procedures used. | ||
auditors are watchdogs but not bloodhounds. | ||
auditors must audit the whole year. |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started