There are a couple of elements that are included in the deception that is related to fraud. Those elements are false statements, misrepresentations, inaccurate information, promoting and selling unnecessary products, and deceitful conduct. With these elements, someone committing fraud has a purpose to gain something of value, normally money, by misleading or deceiving someone into believing something that the perpetrator knows to be false ("What is fraud by deception?"). In this case, I think that Suze Orman was able to check off every one of these elements when promoting her products and giving financial advice. Since everyone's financial situations are different, there's no possible way that her advice was 100% accurate for everyone listening. Not only was her information inaccurate, but her deceiving personality and confidence allowed her to misrepresent her information. She has a very convincing personality, so it was easy for her to make a horrible product sound extremely good. She was able to get away with this and become successful because she was first able to gain the trust of her consumers. Once this trust was gained, Orman knew that consumers would look more into buying any product that she was promoting without even getting a second financial opinion if it was necessary or not.

what will be the complimet argue on this?

References

"What is fraud by deception?" (2021).Deceptolgy. https://www.deceptology.com/deceptive/what-is-fraud-by-deception.html#:~:text=It%20is%20the%20act%20of%20intentionally%20deceiving%20someone,something%20that%20the%20perpetrator%20knows%20to%20be%20false.