There are two adjacent vacant parcels of land that are exactly the same in every respect (size, location, accessibility) except for their zoning designation. The zoning designation for one parcel would allow for an office building to be developed on the site whereas the zoning designation for the other parcel of land would not allow for an office building to be developed on the site. Is one site worth more than the other? Why? What is the key assumption you must make to justify your answer? Limit your answer to no more than three sentences