There have been allegations by RBC that Dee Feck Tivh's design had defects, which is why RBC was delayed. If a negligence claim for defective design is asserted against Dee Feck Tivh by RBC, what is Dee Feck Tivh's best argument that the negligence claim is not valid? Group of answer choices That there is no privity of contract between RBC and Dee Feck Tivh. That Dee Feck Tivh did not guarantee its design of the structure simply by providing the design documents to Priceco. That Dee, Feck and Tivh did not violate any code of ethics in its design. That the economic loss rule applies