These questions are regarding the International Paper's Wildlife and Recreation Program case study?

Questions: 1. How did IP's attitude towards recreation and wildlife management change? What are the benets of the new mindset? 2. What are the costs of the recreation program? 3. What obstacles existed to getting the recreation program off the ground? How were these overcome? 4. Why have the costs from litter, arson, and other recreational abuses declined over time for International Paper? Why did poaching decrease on IP lands over the time period and why did lP cut back on the legal hunting allowed? 5. What contributed to the success of the wildlife and recreation program? 6. Why have nongame species population numbers improved? 7. How might [P's management style differ from the management style of the Forest Service or the management of a state forest? What might the environmental consequences of those differences be? How might [P's recreation program be different if the timberlands were located in the western United States rather than the south? 8. What does the future hold for [P's recreational opportunities? For its wildlife management program? 9. How would the task and cost of implementing these programs have been different if the land holdings were not contiguous but were fragmented