These questions refer to "Hartford Case Study: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?" Dates refer to the timeline in the case. 1. June 20, 2014: Why might have Hartford taxpayers opposed the project? 2. September 14, 2014: What are some of the disadvantages of the public-private partnership that the city decided on? 3. June 10, 2015: Dunkin' Brands purchased naming rights. While not announced at the time, the Hartford Courant claimed Dunkin' paid more than $250,000 per year. The team received the first $50,000 of any naming rights and balance is split between the team and the city (at $250K, that's $150K for the team and $100K for the city). a. How did Dunkin' estimate the value of those rights? b. What could have changed since the original deal in 2015 that would make the rights worth more or less than $250,000 ? 4. The team had to play the entire 2016 season on the road. a. Why couldn't the team continue to play in New Britain? b. They were not the first minor league team to play all their games on the road. What are some of the disadvantages of doing so? 5. June 2019: What is the status of the lawsuit Centerplan Construction v. Hartford? Hint: It is still going on