This is a twin of case analysis practice as compared to FBI vs. Apple.

The basic facts are:A large group of people gathered for a meeting in the front of White House on Jan 6, 2021. After they listened to Trump's speech on ".., we're going to walk down, and I'll be there with you. ... We are going to the Capitol, and we are going to try and give ...."Trump did not go ...

We know what has happened in the Capital Hill has become the part of history already.Those social media firms have banned Trump's accounts permanently.As a business manager working for one of those firms,can plug the related facts into the following components and also reach your own conclusion for the following:

Whether Trump's free speech right, as alleged to be protected by the 1st Amendment, has been violated.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/10/us/trump-speech-riot.html

Fact:

Issue:

Applicable Law/Rule:

Analysis:

Conclusion:

Hints:1. Are those social media firms a state actor?Can a non-state actor be compelled to do something it does want to do?

2.Is Trump a state actor, or a private citizen?What are the Standards of Review applicable here?